Pre-Inspection Self Audits That Actually Find Problems - Stop Checklist Theater and Start Finding Real R

Charles H. Paul Instructor:
Charles H. Paul
Friday, March 27, 2026
10:00 AM PDT | 01:00 PM EDT
60 Minutes
Webinar ID: 503833

More Trainings by this Expert

Price Details
Live Webinar
$149 One Attendee
$299 Corporate Live
Recorded Webinar
$199 One Attendee
$399 Corporate Recorded
Combo Offers
Live + Recorded
$299 $348 Live + Recorded
Corporate (Live + Recorded)
$599 $698 Corporate
(Live + Recorded)

Live: One Dial-in One Attendee

Corporate Live: Any number of participants

Recorded: Access recorded version, only for one participant unlimited viewing for 6 months ( Access information will be emailed 24 hours after the completion of live webinar)

Corporate Recorded: Access recorded version, Any number of participants unlimited viewing for 6 months ( Access information will be emailed 24 hours after the completion of live webinar)

Overview:

Most regulated organizations conduct internal audits regularly, yet many are still surprised by inspection findings.

Teams complete checklists, verify signatures, and confirm that procedures exist, but regulators continue to uncover systemic weaknesses, documentation gaps, and process failures. The problem is not the frequency of audits it is the approach. Too often, internal audits become "checklist theater": a routine exercise designed to demonstrate compliance rather than test whether the quality system truly works under real-world conditions.

This practical, high-impact webinar introduces a different mindset: auditing for risk instead of auditing for paperwork. Participants will learn how to design and execute pre-inspection self audits that mirror the way investigators actually evaluate operations.

Rather than simply confirming that documents are present and complete, effective audits probe how processes perform, how employees make decisions, and how well controls prevent errors. The goal is not to pass an internal review it is to uncover vulnerabilities before regulators do.

The session begins by examining why traditional internal audits often fail to detect meaningful issues. Common pitfalls include calendar-based schedules that ignore risk, overreliance on static checklists, confirmation bias, and a focus on cosmetic observations instead of systemic problems. Participants will see how these habits create a false sense of security while leaving critical exposure areas untouched.

From there, the webinar introduces a risk-based audit strategy that prioritizes time and resources where they matter most. Attendees will learn how to use deviation trends, CAPA history, complaints, training gaps, and performance metrics to identify high-risk processes and determine audit frequency. Practical tools such as risk ranking matrices and heat maps help teams focus their attention on failure modes that could lead to regulatory findings or patient risk.

A core component of the program demonstrates how to simulate real FDA or regulatory questioning. Participants will explore investigator-style techniques such as following evidence trails, tracing batch records from start to finish, interviewing operators on the floor, and asking "show me" rather than "tell me" questions. These methods reveal how procedures function in practice, not just how they appear on paper.

The webinar also highlights the red-flag indicators inspectors notice immediately, including backlogged CAPAs, repeat deviations, inconsistent training, weak data integrity controls, and workarounds that signal ineffective processes. Recognizing these signals allows organizations to intervene early and correct issues before they escalate.

Finally, the session focuses on turning audit findings into preventive actions rather than administrative paperwork. Participants will learn how to write clear, evidence-based observations, identify true root causes, design sustainable controls, and measure effectiveness over time. The emphasis is on strengthening systems so that problems do not recur.

By the end of this webinar, attendees will have a practical framework for conducting smarter, more targeted audits that expose real risks, drive meaningful improvements, and create genuine inspection readiness. Instead of performing audits to satisfy a requirement, organizations will learn how to use them as powerful tools for prevention and continuous compliance.

Why should you Attend: If your organization conducts regular internal audits yet still feels anxious when regulators arrive, this webinar is designed for you. Pre-Inspection Self Audits That Actually Find Problems shows you how to move beyond routine checklists and perform audits that uncover real risks before inspectors do.

Instead of spending time confirming signatures and paperwork, you will learn how to think like an investigator, target high-risk processes, ask the right questions, follow evidence trails, and identify the red flags that commonly trigger FDA findings. You will also gain practical tools to convert observations into preventive, system-level improvements rather than administrative CAPAs that add work without reducing risk. Whether you work in Quality, Regulatory, Manufacturing, or Compliance, this session provides actionable strategies you can apply immediately to strengthen your quality system, reduce surprises during inspections, and build true, everyday inspection readiness not just audit-day appearances.

Areas Covered in the Session:

  • Welcome & Objectives (5 min)
    • Purpose of internal audits in regulated environments
    • Why many audit programs fail to prevent findings
    • Definition of "checklist theater"
    • Session goals and expected outcomes
    • Learning objectives
  • Why Traditional Internal Audits Miss Real Problems (8 min)
    • Calendar-based vs risk-based auditing
    • Overreliance on document checklists
    • Confirmation bias and "proving compliance"
    • Auditing paperwork instead of processes
    • Cosmetic findings vs systemic risks
    • Consequences during FDA/EMA inspections
  • Foundations of a Risk-Based Audit Strategy (12 min)
    • Shifting from coverage to risk prioritization
    • Identifying high-risk systems and processes
    • Using deviations, CAPAs, complaints, and trends as inputs
    • Risk ranking criteria (impact, probability, detectability)
    • Audit frequency based on risk level
    • Focusing on failure modes and controls
    • Sample risk scoring matrix
    • Building an annual risk-based audit plan
  • Planning Audits Like an Inspector (8 min)
    • Defining audit scope based on risk signals
    • Reviewing historical performance data
    • Selecting realistic samples
    • Preparing investigator-style questions
    • Planning floor time vs conference room time
    • Aligning auditors with operational flow
    • Establishing objective evidence requirements
  • Simulating FDA/Inspector Questioning Techniques (10 min)
    • "Show me" vs "tell me" questioning
    • Tracing records from start to finish
    • Following evidence trails
    • Interviewing operators and supervisors
    • Probing for real practice vs written procedure
    • Testing knowledge of roles and responsibilities
    • Using "what happens if" scenarios
    • Conducting mock inspection walkthroughs
  • Red-Flag Indicators Inspectors Notice Immediately (8 min)
    • Backlogged deviations or CAPAs
    • Repeat or recurring issues
    • Temporary fixes without root cause
    • Data integrity gaps or missing audit trails
    • Perfect or suspiciously clean records
    • Training inconsistencies or outdated curricula
    • Poor housekeeping and visual disorder
    • Operators unsure of procedures
    • Overly complex or unused SOPs
    • Manual workarounds for validated systems
  • Documenting Meaningful Findings (5 min)
    • Writing clear, evidence-based observations
    • Distinguishing symptoms vs root causes
    • Risk-based severity classification
    • Avoiding vague or subjective language
    • Linking findings to process or system controls
    • Prioritizing issues by impact
  • Turning Findings Into Preventive Actions (6 min)
    • Systemic corrective vs administrative fixes
    • Designing sustainable process controls
    • Reducing reliance on retraining alone
    • Defining measurable effectiveness checks
    • Trending outcomes over time
    • Integrating results into CAPA and management review
    • Preventing recurrence vs closing paperwork
  • Practical "Real Audit" Workflow Model (3 min)
    • Select focus areas using risk data
    • Observe operations on the floor
    • Interview personnel
    • Trace records and systems
    • Identify systemic risks
    • Implement preventive improvements
    • Trend results and refine strategy
  • Key Takeaways & Wrap-Up (2 min)
    • Audit for risk, not checklist completion
    • Think like an investigator
    • Follow the evidence trail
    • Focus on system weaknesses
    • Convert findings into prevention
    • Fewer, smarter audits improve readiness

Who Will Benefit:
  • Quality Assurance (QA)
  • Quality Control (QC)
  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Compliance and Governance
  • Internal Audit
  • Manufacturing Operations
  • Production Management
  • Validation and Engineering
  • Training and Learning & Development
  • Document Control and Technical Writing
  • CAPA and Investigation Teams
  • Risk Management
  • Supplier Quality Management
  • Laboratory Operations
  • Site and Plant Leadership
  • Continuous Improvement / Operational Excellence
  • Data Integrity and CSV/CSA Teams
  • Clinical Operations (GCP environments)
  • Contract Manufacturing Oversight
  • Executive Quality and Compliance Leadership


Speaker Profile
Charles H. Paul is the President of C. H. Paul Consulting, Inc. - a regulatory, manufacturing, training, and technical documentation consulting firm - celebrating its twentieth year in business in 2017. He has been a regulatory and management consultant and an Instructional Technologist for 30 years and has published numerous white papers on various regulatory and training subjects. The firm works with both domestic and international clients designing solutions for complex training and documentation issues.

He has held senior positions in consulting and in corporate training development prior to forming C. H. Paul Consulting, Inc. He also worked for several years in government contracting managing the development of significant Army-wide training development contracts impacting virtually all of the active Army and changing the training paradigm throughout the military.

He has dedicated his entire professional career explaining the benefits of performance-based training


Subscribe to our Newsletter

Subscribe for Compliance Alerts Research Reports Absolutely Free